Compliance · Disclosures

Past Performance Disclaimer

A past performance disclaimer is the required language accompanying historical return data, covering gross vs. net figures, the time period, and that past results don't guarantee future ones. The SEC Marketing Rule sets the substance: what has to be disclosed and calculated. This entry covers the practical side, the specific wording and on-screen timing that satisfies it in a video or social post.

Need this reflected in your content strategy? See how we handle compliance across content

What the disclaimer has to cover

ElementRequirementSource
Gross vs. netNet performance must appear with equal prominence to any gross figure, same period, same methodology17 CFR 275.206(4)-1(d)(1)
Standardized periodsOne-, five-, and ten-year returns, each with equal prominence, ending no earlier than the most recent calendar year-end. Life of the portfolio substitutes for any period it did not exist. Private funds are excluded17 CFR 275.206(4)-1(d)(2)
No implied SEC endorsementThe disclaimer cannot state or imply the SEC approved or reviewed the performance calculation17 CFR 275.206(4)-1(d)(3)
Fair and balanced presentationA statement that past performance does not guarantee future results is standard practice; it supports, but doesn't replace, the fair-and-balanced requirement17 CFR 275.206(4)-1(a)(6)

On-screen timing

FormatPractical standard
Spoken on cameraDisclaimer should appear on screen at the same time the number is spoken, not only in a description below the video
Text or graphic on screenHeld long enough to read at a normal pace, matched to the length of the performance claim it qualifies
Recurring claims in one videoRepeated at each point a new performance figure appears, not stated once at the start and assumed to cover the rest
LivestreamRepeated periodically, since viewers may join mid-stream and miss an opening disclosure

What this means for your marketing

The net figure needs the same screen time as the gross figure. If a return is on screen for five seconds in large type, the net version needs the same size and duration, not a fine-print aside.

"Past performance doesn't guarantee future results" is necessary but not sufficient. That standard line covers one part of the requirement. It doesn't substitute for the gross/net pairing or the standardized time periods.

A single strong year fails the standardized-period test on its own. Showing only the best twelve months of a track record, without the one-, five-, and ten-year figures alongside it, is the selective presentation the rule targets.

The disclaimer belongs in the same format as the claim. A spoken performance number needs a spoken or synchronized on-screen disclaimer, since a caption alone will be missed by anyone watching without sound.

What this looks like in practice

Illustrative example: past performance segment markup (not a real client review)
0:12
GROSS ONLYOn-screen graphic: "+18.4% annual return" held for 4 seconds, no net figure shown.
RevisedOn-screen graphic shows both "+18.4% gross" and "+14.9% net of fees" side by side, same size, held for the same 4 seconds.

17 CFR 275.206(4)-1(d)(1) requires net performance with at least equal prominence to gross.

0:20
NOT STANDARDIZEDVoiceover: "Our fund returned 18% last year." No other periods mentioned.
RevisedVoiceover and on-screen text add the one-, five-, and ten-year (or since-inception) figures alongside the one-year number.

A single strong year without the standardized comparison periods fails 206(4)-1(d)(2).

0:35
DISCLAIMER TOO BRIEFText disclaimer flashes for under 1 second at the bottom of the frame: "Past performance not indicative of future results."
RevisedDisclaimer held for at least the duration of the performance claim it qualifies, in a font size legible at normal viewing distance.

A disclaimer viewers cannot read in the time given does not satisfy a fair-and-balanced presentation.

Common questions

Primary sources

Daniel Schoester

Daniel Schoester

Founder & CEO

Daniel Schoester combines years of SEO obsession with financial know-how. After receiving an Honours Bachelor of Business Administration (Finance), Daniel began working at a prominent mortgage website, where his content quickly quadrupled monthly traffic to over one million views.

Building on this success, Daniel launched Croton Content to help clients scale through evergreen content assets — notably working with Forbes Advisor, Moneywise, and Hardbacon.

In 2024, Daniel expanded his focus to YouTube after studying Google’s algorithm changes. He noticed YouTube’s increasing alignment with search visibility compared to traditional written SEO content — plus its ability to generate passive revenue and long-term brand authority.

Educational information only. This is not legal or compliance advice. Confirm current requirements with your compliance officer and the primary sources above.

Croton Content

Finance content that clears compliance the first time

We build content programs for regulated financial brands, with compliance review designed into the production schedule rather than bolted onto the end of it.