Compliance · Disclosure

Form ADV

Also known as: ADV, Investment Adviser Registration Form, SEC Form ADV

Form ADV is the registration form investment advisers file with the SEC or state regulators. Part 2A, the brochure, is the plain-English disclosure clients receive before signing an advisory agreement. The form has five parts: 1A and 1B for regulators, 2A and 2B for clients, and Part 3, the Form CRS relationship summary, for retail investors. Three routinely reach a client: the Part 2A brochure, the Part 2B supplement covering the specific people giving advice, and, for firms with retail investors, Form CRS.

Need this reflected in your content strategy? See how we handle compliance across content

The parts of Form ADV

PartContentAudience
Part 1AFirm info: business practices, assets under management, disciplinary history, ownershipFiled with regulators, publicly searchable
Part 1BState-specific supplementOnly for state-registered advisers
Part 2A (the brochure)Plain-English narrative: services, fees, conflicts of interest, disciplinary historyDelivered to clients
Part 2B (the brochure supplement)Education, business background, and disciplinary history of the specific people giving adviceDelivered to clients

Filing and delivery deadlines

RequirementDeadline
Annual updating amendmentWithin 90 days after the end of the adviser's fiscal year
Other-than-annual amendmentPromptly when Part 1A Items 1, 3, 9, or 11 become inaccurate in any way, including a new disciplinary event, or when Items 4, 8, or 10 become materially inaccurate, such as a change of control
Part 2A delivery, SEC-registered advisersBefore or at the time of entering into the advisory contract
Part 2A delivery, state-registered advisersAt least 48 hours before entering the contract, or at the time of entering it if the client has 5 business days to terminate without penalty
Part 2B reviewAt least annually; update when information becomes materially inaccurate

What this means for your marketing

The brochure and the website need to say the same thing. Item 2's summary of material changes and the fee and conflict disclosures in Part 2A must match what marketing describes. A website claiming a fee structure or service the brochure doesn't list is a live discrepancy, not a stylistic one.

Advisor bios get cross-checked against Part 2B, not the other way around. SEC-registered advisers do not file brochure supplements with the SEC, so Part 2B is not posted on IAPD, but the firm must deliver it to clients and keep copies in its files, and examiners request it directly. State-registered advisers do file supplements through IARD for each supervised person doing business in that state. Either way, a website bio with a credential, degree, or years of experience that doesn't match the delivered supplement is the kind of gap an exam finds first.

Disciplinary history can't be edited away by marketing. Whatever appears in Part 1A's disciplinary section stays publicly searchable on IAPD regardless of what a bio page says. Content strategy should address it when material, not avoid the subject.

The 90-day filing clock is a natural content-compliance sync point. The annual updating amendment period is a built-in checkpoint to re-verify that public-facing bios, fee pages, and disclosures still match the filed brochure.

What this looks like in a bio page

Advisor bio page, homepage draft, pre-review markup
Mismatch"15+ years of institutional trading experience."
Revised"12 years of institutional trading experience" (matching the business background reported in Form ADV Part 2B).

Bio copy must match the business background reported in Part 2B. A rounded-up figure is the kind of detail an exam or an IAPD cross-check catches quickly.

MissingNo reference to a settled disciplinary matter listed in Part 1A.
RevisedAdd a brief, factual reference to the disclosure, framed per firm compliance guidance.

Silence on a publicly searchable disciplinary item does not make it invisible. It makes the omission the more visible problem.

Unsubstantiated"Ranked among the top advisors in the region."
Revised"Recognized by [named publication], [year]," or removed if no verifiable source exists.

A ranking claim needs a named, checkable source. An unnamed one reads as the kind of unsubstantiated claim both the Marketing Rule and state brochure rules flag.

Common questions

Primary sources

Daniel Schoester

Daniel Schoester

Founder & CEO

Daniel Schoester combines years of SEO obsession with financial know-how. After receiving an Honours Bachelor of Business Administration (Finance), Daniel began working at a prominent mortgage website, where his content quickly quadrupled monthly traffic to over one million views.

Building on this success, Daniel launched Croton Content to help clients scale through evergreen content assets — notably working with Forbes Advisor, Moneywise, and Hardbacon.

In 2024, Daniel expanded his focus to YouTube after studying Google’s algorithm changes. He noticed YouTube’s increasing alignment with search visibility compared to traditional written SEO content — plus its ability to generate passive revenue and long-term brand authority.

Educational information only. This is not legal or compliance advice. Confirm current requirements with your compliance officer and the primary sources above.

Croton Content

Finance content that clears compliance the first time

We build content programs for regulated financial brands, with compliance review designed into the production schedule rather than bolted onto the end of it.